Back to Your Future: “What Is Internet Anyway?”

This tremendous Today show clip is, um, today circulating around the very Internet Katie and Bryant (along with some other person) were not quite understanding (or, it seems, caring much about) back in 1994. Katie thinks the @ means “about.” Gumble says “at.” Advantage, Gumble. Best part of the clip, arguably, may be Katie cutting Gumble off @ (!) 1:26—for a couple of awkward seconds it appears he may snap.

Similar comedy gold? McFly/Brown Back to the Future banter (click on dialog or here to expand):

Cross-posted on usblog.havasdigital.com

Posted in Email, Internet, Television, The Future | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Infinite Like? The T-Pain Facebook “Like” Button Tattoo

This has been making the rounds today:

First off, is it ironic to lead with a tweet about a Facebook “Like” button tattoo? It’s a social networking ecosystem, after all…

Anywho, here’s the tattoo:

I’m not sure I like the tattoo but even if I did, in context of the ink itself, it seems you can only like T-Pain, not just the tattoo. Or is the tattoo referring to itself and not T-Pain? Perhaps T-Pain ought to consider having another “Like” button embedded within the tattooed “Like” button? Or perhaps he already thought about that. It is kind of infinite how much Liking we can do.

And that’s your (profound) Friday tattoo criticism.

Cross-posted on usblog.havasdigital.com

Posted in Branded Content, Facebook | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Social Networkers: Don’t Go Outside (Today)

A recent piece on the 10 most popular brand pages on Facebook produced, among others, this important reader comment:

Harsh, Mike. And dangerous, my angry friend. Check out our weather in Boston below (or from the “Ridiculous cold…” editorial source).  Because, Mike, even social networking outside today is not a wise idea.

Cross-posted on usblog.havasdigital.com

Posted in Facebook, Mobile, Social Networking | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Verizon, Apple: Take My $$, Please

With Verizon expected to announce today it will finally sell the iPhone, I in turn announce that my own Palm Pre POS’ days are numbered. The Palm is a corded (battery life: 6 mins), sort of smartphone that is very good at breaking and producing derision from people presuming someone working in digital would have a much better, cooler phone.

Apple will make $$. Verizon will make $$. iPay.

Soon to be Decommissioned Palm (photo: a BlackBerry)

Cross-posted on usblog.havasdigital.com

Posted in Mobile, The Future | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

7 Things To Do in 2011/Tomorrow

1) read more stuff that has a number, indicating list, in headline
2) read more stuff about things that will trend in 2011
3) retweet something trending, to be trendy
4) to buck New Year’s resolution trend, eat more unleafy processed foods
5) check power steering fluid and, coincidentally, win this AMC Eagle on eBay (nice photography, btw… Instagram or does the car also come with a vintage wood-paneled Polaroid?)

6) dress for success (weather pending)
7) continue to know nothing about Snooki

Cross-posted on usblog.havasdigital.com (titled: 6 7 8 7 Things To Do in 2011 Tomorrow)

Posted in Media, Social Media, The Future | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

When You Do Not Have Mail

Yesterday, on account of #snowpocalypse2010, I didn’t get mail. Fine by me, although surprising. Until yesterday, the mailman has always had a Santa-down-the-chimney mystique about him (or her, as the case may be). What happened, I wondered, to “Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds”? Well, as it turns out, that’s not actually an official USPS motto. I digress, but only to come to the point that the golden age of snail mail took an official/symbolic (according to me) turn for the lackluster yesterday. What’s next? No Saturday delivery? Awww snap.

Getting shut out on good old fashioned snail mail made me think of the following video, which somehow found me recently via the social media. As you probably know by now, things today find you. So no email or mail was involved in the reception of the video in which comedian Jim Breuer spends a couple minutes with the guy who voiced the famed AOL “You’ve got mail” salutation (as it turns out, in 1989 on a cassette deck—legit!).


“You don’t get a check for that?” Good stuff.

So, it’s cool to attach a face to the voice of email’s/internet’s childhood/adolescence. Okay, so it’s definitely a bit of a bummer the guy (Elwood, btw) seemingly didn’t make much dough from the once big-time SOT. AOL still uses the “You’ve got mail” welcome, but dial-up is essentially dead (way past peak?) and “You’ve got mail” is a symbol of the emergence dial-up and the cultural permeation of email. You were excited to receive your email and the “You’ve got mail!” salutation resonated that excitement of the golden age of email. “You’ve got mail” is now an anachronism. Courtesy of our fast connections, we’re drowning in email. Email itself, some argue, is going the way of dial-up. I’ve heard the argument and find it far-fetched, but stranger things have happened.

At least the AOL guy still has his day job…in TV.

Cross-posted on usblog.havasdigital.com

Posted in Email, Social Media, The Future | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

LinkedIn Creepiness

Yesterday, a friend tweeted the following:

I could not agree more and was just recently thinking the same thing. I don’t think I’ve imported email contacts into LinkedIn. So what gives with the algorithmic creepiness, LinkedIn? Check out some of my suggested contacts from just moments ago… Peaches?

Are you creeped out by social association assumption? Tell us, and you’ll forever more be connected with this blog’s baggage.

Cross-posted on usblog.havasdigital.com

Posted in Social Media, Social Networking | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Price is Print?

Reports of their demise greatly exaggerated or not, I still subscribe to actual print magazines. With an ever expanding media consumption mix, I recently cast away one of these magazine subscriptions. It was painless and I can envision starting to let print subscriptions lapse with the reckless abandon of someone suddenly paying fewer bills. Hear that, magazines? You know I love you but, in turn, know this: it’s not a good time to piss off an old friend.

This is why we now turn our first-person plural attention to The New Yorker, the venerable anxiety-in-stacks weekly. (Added bonus for New Yorker subscribers: wanna be on A&E’s Hoarders?!). Don’t get me wrong, it’s a great magazine, but the weeks roll by too quickly and I’m relieved when I can leave a few issues on an airplane or in burdensome bunches inside a curbside recycling bin. So it seems odd that now, during this precarious era in our print relationship, The New Yorker / Condé Nast is all but challenging me to cut my longtime subscription. Things started going south when I was prompted, via good old USPS-delivered chunk-of-tree-flesh, to renew the subscription that wasn’t scheduled to expire for months. There is no end to these non-urgent-urgent messages to act quickly to receive a generous renewal rate. In my case, The New Yorker was offering a “professional courtesy” rate of $69.95 for a one year re-up (or two years for $99.95).

Thing is, if you head on over to Amazon.com, you can subscribe to The New Yorker for $39.95 for a year ($69.95 for two). But waitthere’s (no need for) more! There’s also an auto-renewal Amazon option so, as the bulleted portion reads: “The publisher won’t send you renewal notices.” So I’d get a much better deal on the magazine if I simply let my subscription expire and then resubscribe through Amazon.

To add injury to insult, while on The New Yorker website to write customer care, I found that I could renew right there for $10 less than the “offer” I received in the mail–still more than Amazon, but less than the very extra super special offer that was sent to readers whom I can only guess the publisher is presuming not to be much of a digital creature. Gimme A Break!, Nell Carter-style. (In a web-generated message to New Yorker customer care, I opted to forgo rant, so I wrote out, “Give me a break,” and made no mention of Nell Carter).

Then I sent the message and off into some black hole it went. That was more than two months ago—or a sizable pile of New Yorkers later. These days more than ever New Yorker customer care has no business treating inquiries as if they’re unsolicited submissions to The Talk of the Town section. At a time where an opportunity to keep a reader isn’t simply an opportunity anymore, it’s especially symbolic to experience a magazine drop the ball.

Now, about re-upping that Hot Dog magazine subscription…

The subject, a subscribed to print publication.


Cross-posted on usblog.havasdigital.com

Posted in Magazines, Media, Print, Subscriptions | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fortune Cookie Tweeting

Brands are better served differentiating themselves in social media by ensuring their social media copy is less fortune cookie copy; more sharp, conversational copywriting.

A quick scroll of the Coca-Cola tweet stream, reveals they are sparing with broadcast tweets (the tweets blasting to all 175K-plus @CocaCola followers). This strategy, in theory, provides more bang for the tweet when they do blast a tweet to the masses and ensures less chance of follower fatigue, albeit with lower visibility (a double-edged sword for many brands, but not necessarily for one as ubiquitous as Coke). Knowing this, it’s more than probable that the following recent tweet was fairly-to-very premeditated:

That folks, is a tweet dropping in on you as an unpaid ad that reads like a fortune cookie. It blasts the followers and latches onto a larger #happiness conversation/trending topic within twitter. If done well, it works. And as seen here, if done just okay, it also works. Within minutes the fortune Coke-ie had more than 70 retweets:

I don’t mean to be a crank about this and I really don’t mean to single Coke out as the only occasional corporate misguided tweeter—they’re certainly not alone and, by most accounts, are way ahead of the social curve. I’m sure in my days at Dunkin’ Donuts’ social helm, I may have missed on one or two gems. Okay, I did. Maybe even three times. I just happened to see this particular Coca-Cola tweet in my own feed and grabbed it as an example of something we see a lot. I can, because Coke put it out there for scrutiny. Brands don’t bat a thousand in social media, just as they don’t in traditional advertising, public relations, and everything else they do.

All I’m saying (in too many words perhaps)—when a brand decides to tweet all its followers, the brand should sound like itself, not like a fortune cookie.

Cross-posted on usblog.havasdigital.com

Posted in Advertising, Branded Content, Social Media, Twitter | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Small Town Lament

In the recent Bob Edwards’ interview of John Mellencamp (Bob Edwards Weekend podcast), Mellencamp talks a bit about progress and quality of life. He then says:

The invention of computers and the internet… is going to turn around and destroy this country. Corporate America has made every town the same. I can go anywhere and there’s a Starbucks. I can go anywhere and there’s the Gap…

According to Mellencamp and the proximity of these statements, the internet’s destructive nature and corporate-influenced uniformity are linked. In the interview, he does not elaborate about the connection or say much about why the internet is harmful, other than touching upon it being terrible for music (lesser quality and you can’t touch it, smell it, see it, as he recalls he used to love to do at Tower Records). I’d be interested for more Mellencamp on the computer/internet theory and whether he thinks the destruction will be limited the US. My guess is the context of a Mellencamp conversation is likely to land stateside considering his recurring commentary on the plight of the American farmer and the plight of the American dream. His commentary in the interview is sweeping and lacking argument, but it’s got Pink Houses context.

These days, now more than ever, we may be born and live in small towns or big towns, but we all have the ability to connect with one another in the socially connected world. There’s a lot of noise out there, but there’s also harmony to be found within the conversation.

Is Mellencamp Begrudgingly on Facebook?

Considering the Mellencamp’s larger Americana career themes, he’s talking about community and the identity of a community shaped by individual citizens. His commentary produces an interesting question. Is social networking a modern way for people to attain or regain lost community? Although we call places and topics where people actively engage in and on within social spaces community, can they really be considered similar to the experiences of tangible communities within actual physical places of community congregation? I’d argue that social communities are extensions of tangible communities that can then morph in any number of ways depending on which elements of a particular community influence others. We can now share and participate on whim, or otherwise, based on any interest or topic from anywhere. Within the frivolity, social networking is a way people can become involved and possibly evolve without going to great lengths. Virtual rain on the Scarecrow has the potential to keep a message alive and bring about positive change in perpetuity.

But can social space truly shape identity? Or are we all, within social space, varying degrees of Oz behind the curtain?

Cross-posted on usblog.havasdigital.com

Posted in Community, Social Media, The Future | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment